Welcome to the Rileys

Sometimes stuff happens in life that jolts us out of our comfort zone. It removes us from our daily routines and leaves us lagging in the pace of our own life. It can affect our relationships with others and can make our otherwise familiar environment seem alien. This is precisely what happens to Doug and Lois Riley when their 15 year old daughter dies in a car crash. The couple’s 30 year marriage suffers. Lois is on medication and is psychologically housebound. Doug sleeps with a local waitress but later she dies. Whilst on a work conference in New Orleans and unable to relate his latest grief to anyone, he befriends a young teenage stripper. Feeling the spark of paternal instinct reigniting his soul, he (and later his wife) take the young lady under their wing.

It is a very unlikely scenario and in any other situation it would seem far fetched and slightly surreal that the characters would find themselves in this situation and these environments. However, it’s more symbolic of everything I mentioned earlier about the experience of trauma and one’s journey through it. At one point Doug reflects “I feel like I’ve landed on Mars” and that about sums it up for all the characters. I most enjoyed Lois and Doug having what was probably the frankest conversation they’ve ever had about their marriage at nighttime surrounded by the slum dwellings. Even for Mallory, the stripper, the Rileys intervention into her life has a profound effect. Their mature and slightly philosophical handling of the bad luck life has dealt them is something she eventually takes to her own heart, even inspiring her to initiate the Rileys to face some skeletons of their own.

When asked what he wanted people to take away from this film, director Jake Scott said “Hope”. Tick box. Michael Frayn once gave one of his characters, Brian Stimpson, one of my favourite ever lines. “It’s not the despair…I can handle the despair… it’s the hope!” Indeed hope cannot be reached without despair. What Scott does well in this movie is to ensure the despair doesn’t become too indulgent. James Gandolfini’s suppressed emotions are spot on – I should know, I’m British! His performance would get my vote for Best Actor whatever the shape of the trophy! Kristen Stewart avoids cliches a character like hers could have easily become, crafting a more layered dynamic performance and an understated chemistry in her relationship with the Rileys, which pleased me. Melissa Leo’s Lois Riley had many incarnations – the shell of a devastated woman racked with self-guilt, the perfect American mother and a young woman trapped in a middle aged womans body. And once, just once, whilst telling Mallory for the first time of the death of her daughter – a brief glint in her eyes of who she used to be. Superb stuff.

To simply call this picture a “feel good” film would be to dismiss many of its finer qualities. It could have easily been corny, over-indulgent, sentimental pap. But writer Ken Hixon and director Jake Scott have produced something beautifully genuine, simple yet complex, poignant yet aspiring. And, if anything else, it is worth watching just for Gandolfini’s performance.

“Welcome to the Rileys” is released in UK cinemas on 18th November 2011
[rating=5]

Posted in 2011 | Leave a comment

Les Diaboliques

Rated at number 4 on the imdb horror chart I very nearly gave up on this film. But my perseverance was rewarded eventually with some classic suspense and thriller that, rumour has it, inspired Hitchcock’s approach to Psycho. Directed by Henri-Georges Clouzot, it tells the story of how a woman and her husband’s mistress kill said husband and dispose of his body in the swimming pool of the boarding school they run. But at some point the body disappears from the pool leaving the two women frantic and confused. Enter a French version of Columbo (complete with mac and smoking habit) whose probing investigation unnerves them. Add some unexplained sightings of the deceased and things begin to look very grim.
The first half hour was excruciatingly slow and with my finger poised to stop the film, I waited patiently. But, rest assured, once the murder is committed the story picks up and continues at a much better pace. By the end of the film you’ll be impressed by the suspense and tension created. And you can see the influence this film has had on other great classics. The murky waters of the pool reminiscent of the car being extricated from the swamp in Psycho. Also the use of a typewriter to eerie effect later echoed in The Shining.
In a time when most horror is sensationalised to the point of saturation, this film serves a reminder of how the basics can be just as good or even, if left in the right hands, better. I noted that at some key moments of suspense, no music or extra sound effects were used. Just good old fashioned silence. I didn’t need anymore. Similarly the acting from the leads was never OTT. In fact, I found it frustrating having to read the subtitles at the expense of watching some great performances. But that’s not the film’s fault.
All in all, a good one for a dark rainy afternoon in front of the telly.
[rating=3]

Posted in DVD, Halloween | Leave a comment

The Thing

Kurt Russell stars in John Carpenters’ remake of the 1951 classic, though it is actually more widely recognised as an alternative adaptation of JW Campbell Jnr’s “Who goes there?“. This version is set in US laboratory in the Antarctic (not the North Pole) and is home to a team of researchers who are victims of an alien predator who can hide inside them. One by one each member of the team is either picked off by the alien or by one of his paranoid colleagues. The result is pretty much carnage.
The make-up and special effects, though early 1980’s, are still quite impressive. These creatures would have seemed quite ahead of their time and I imagine the whole film cleared the way for the Alien franchise. Even the location is similarly secluded and the fact that the thing has lain dormant for up to 100,000 years adds a great dimension which extended the threat beyond the icy tundra, as well as cleverly sowing the seeds for future sequels or development. However this has never happened.
The mystery and suspense as the story unfolds is, as always, masterfully handled by Carpenter. Unlike his other films the music is not done by him but by Ennio Morricone. Can’t say I remembered the music much, but is that a bad thing? I couldn’t hum the tunes from The Shining either. And unlike another, more recent Carpenter film Ghosts of Mars which I had the misfortune to watch recently, all location shots are done in the genuine, conventional manner rather than using SFX or models which, as in the aforementioned film, can ruin it! Impressive cinematographie from Carpenter regular Dean Cudney(Halloween, The Fog, Escape From New York.)
All in all, this is a fun little horror/thriller which has survived the test of time probably because, like old Christmas decorations, it only gets dug out once in a while and doesn’t pretend to be anything else than it is! [rating=3]
Buy “The Thing” [Blu-ray][Region Free]

Posted in DVD, Halloween | Leave a comment

Ghost Ship

The tale of the Mary Celeste surfaces quite quickly in this story of a salvage crew who find an abandoned ship. But as the rather grizzly prologue to this film suggests, this is more than just a ghost ship. It holds secrets that are slowly unlocked as the film proceeds. It is no secret, however, to anyone who watches Hollywood horror that when a character says they’re happy or looking to the future or show signs of being over confident or content, they are for it. And the salvage crew in this film certainly tick the boxes. So it is a relief to find there are slightly more twists and turns to the plot that just their inevitable demise.
This is a great film for Halloween if you’re a fan of Triangle with hints of The Shining, though it can occasionally be slightly too heavy on the cliches. For me, the secret to good suspense horror story is to give a taster and leave the rest to the imagination. There’s nothing more off putting than a story too eager to please and explain. That said, whilst it did occasionally do that, this film is superb on production atmosphere. The empty ship is just spine chillingly striking and whilst the actors maybe occasionally over the top, their environment speaks volumes.
Buy on DVD or Blu-Ray

[rating=4]

Posted in DVD, Halloween | Leave a comment

Ring

Tragedy comes to one part of suburban Tokyo (if there is such a thing) when a group of teenage friends die in mysterious circumstances on the same day. One of the victims aunties’ investigates and discovers that, in accordance to a popular urban myth, they had all watched the same video tape then received a silent telephone call – then exactly one week later they’d died. When she watches the tape and, surprise surprise, gets a silent phone call she realises that she has only a week left to live and must unravel the mystery of this curse. Her journey, with the help of her ex-husband, starts with explaining the mysterious images she witnesses on the video tape.
The film was originally Japanese released in 1998 (as just “Ring”). It was later remade by the Americans in 2002 (as “The Ring”) I’ve not seen the latter and was recommended to watch the original which I found to be quite a tame affair. I imagine the storyline may have aged slightly. The videotape would now be an mp4 viral on the internet. Or else the grainy images within the cursed tape would be restored, colour added, motion stabilised and any apocalyptic devil shots could be photoshopped and airbrushed to make them look lovely! (I am joking btw just in case any Hollywood producers are reading this) So whilst it maybe considered a classic horror, other classics have aged slightly better. The video theme makes the story rather antiquated and less personal.
[rating=2]

Buy Ring (1998) on DVD

Posted in DVD, Halloween | Leave a comment

Four

Love, sex, jealousy, control and revenge are the order of the day in John Langridge’s new movie “Four”. The movie sells itself with the tagline “There is no such thing as a simple plan“. Once you’ve watched it, you’d be forgiven for thinking that there is no such thing as a simple storyline. It starts with a straightforward, slightly Brit-gangster premise. Man hires detective to kidnap and rough up his wife’s lover, putting the fear of god into him. Thanks to some cleverly balanced humour from writer Paul Chronnell, including an amusing section where torture gives way to a slightly incongruous discussion on film analogies, we realise that there is a hapless element in our perpetrators plans and it soon becomes clear that they are vulnerable victims of their own desire to control.
There appears to be two clear parts to this film, almost like an Act 1 and Act 2. The first half establishes the characters motives. The second half seems almost designed to exploit any preconceptions you may have made, taking unexpected twists and turns and leaving you glued to the unfolding predicament of all involved, in what is a terrific story.
Sean Pertwee is a national asset and blossoms in drama such as this. His character (Detective), whilst candidly mischievous is also the right blend of enigmatic and menacing. His distinctive voice and presence on screen is masterly as it is compelling. Martin Compston (Lover) transforms excellently between two opposite sizes of his character, a helpless then indignant victim. Hell hath no fury like Kierston Wareing’s “Wife”. But Craig Conway’s performance as the Husband will be the most memorable. Confused, castrated and blinkered; the decrepit remains of the factory that surrounds him is a fitting metaphor to his circumstances both at the start and at the end of the movie.
I suppose this story could easily have been a stage play, but the film has successfully rendered it its own. Oddly enough this has been achieved in no small part to Langridge’s theatrical direction and blocking, which manages to utilise a basic space very imaginatively. Mix with that some great cinematography, a neatly paced edit and chilling soundtrack from composer/producer Raiomond Mirza and I guarantee you will require time in your seat at the end of the film to recuperate before leaving the cinema. It’ll be as if you need to regain “control”. Fab.
[rating=5]

Posted in 2011, Halloween | Leave a comment

Melancholia

Depression is a bit like sex. Ok, stay with me. It’s something we know is there, but few of us rarely want to discuss it openly, let alone admit we require help with it. It is the elephant in the room, that thing that we know Uncle so and so suffered with – still he’s in a better place now. It can bubble up feelings of frustration for the bystander who wishes those affected would just snap out of it. “Probably just a phase. After all, we all get down from time to time.” One can become very frustrated trying to understand something that isn’t tangible. Those whom I know have experienced sever bouts of it (and I’m talking years, if not a lifetime!) often seem stuck and sometimes frustrated when trying to accurately describe it.
And, though I’ll be flayed for suggesting it, it is something of a fashionable thing to have. Artists often cite depression as their inspiration for their book, film, painting, acting and so on. And before you know it everyone is suffering from depression. Or are they? After all, there are those people who get a cold  and think they’ve contracted Asian Flu. There are many people I know for whom a headache is a migraine! This does nothing for my sceptisism and before I know it, I’ve dismissed all sufferers with a sweeping generalisation. Then I can sigh a contented bigoted sigh that I’ve formed an opinion about something which doesn’t really affect me anyway, whilst this does little or absolutely nothing for those who have or are suffering real depression.
Lars von Triers’ Melancholia illustrates the subject quite artistically, echoing von Triers own battle with the illness. The story starts with Melancholia, a planet on collision course with the Earth. They collide. Everything as we know it is destroyed. Then we flashback to the days before. The film focuses on the relationship between two sisters, Justine and Claire. The former suffers from depression and her wedding day is a long drawn out car crash. Claire on the other hand finds herself looking after her as well as her own family, juggling reposibilities with moderate success and little thanks. The inevitable end of this film, beautifully stated at the beginning in a montage accompanied by a rather over-used theme from Wagner’s Tristan und Isolde, abandons any hope we may have for the characters. In doing this Trier turns the film into a voyeuristic psychological study of their inevitable demise. Though oddly enough, the demise ends up being physical more than mental.
There is some splendid (possibly Oscar-nominating) performances from Kirsten Dunst (who won Best Actress at Cannes 2011) and Charlotte Gainsbourg, whilst Keifer Sutherland, John Hurt and Charlotte Rampling give excellent support, unlike the characters they play! The cinematography is, if you’ll pardon the pun, out of this world and makes me wonder if much will be forever lost in it’s inevitable transfer to the small screen. More’s the reason for catching this film whilst it’s still in the moviehouses or failing that, get it on BluRay and watch on a big TV!
[rating=5]

Posted in 2011 | Leave a comment

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

THIS REVIEW CONTAINS A SPOILER ALERT

Most cold war spy films have ubiquitous elements about them. There is a drained lack of colour in establishing shots. Everyone chain-smokes and the amount of alcohol consumed makes one wonder how any spy managed to stay focused let alone alert! A good spy must have a house with squeaky wooden floorboards and there must be the sound of an old scratched gramophone record nearby playing a love song from years back which, once complete, just revolves with the sound of a needle click amplified louder than the song itself. Verbal communication is in riddles, nursery rhymes, cliches and code, whilst making love is impersonal and only happens when a snipper is watching.
Yup this film ticks all the boxes of that predictable list. And despite being an almost impossibly complex storyline to follow, it ends up being rather predictable and simple to digest, leaving one feeling a little like “was that it?”. There’s a mole in the secret service and recently retired George Smiley (Gary Oldman) is to sniff them out. Who could it be? Dunno? Try looking at the cast-list. Who’s the big name amongst the cast playing the suspects? What were they thinking?
Oldman is impressive as the inscrutable Smiley and though often quiet (he doesn’t even speak for the first 10 minutes of the film) has a presence which the audience, as well as fellow characters, cannot ignore. But for me the most enjoyable feature in this film is the cinematic time machine to 1973, taking us to both London and communist Hungary. The attention to detail is what you’d expect, but it is also deftly understated leaving you to absorb it’s flavour in measure with the story. So many other films overstate this “we’re in year so-and-so”, hammering the point home to distraction. But when done subtly, as in this film, it can really take you there.
Some themes were slightly overused mind. Endless shots of rooms from the outside of the window looking in. Lots of references in the script to being “grown-up” got a little tiresome. And volume throughout the film is considerably sparse. I know many thriller films like absolute silence before a startling moment, but whilst it lent the film great suspense to begin with, it later lent it a sense of anticlimax.
Oh and there are a lot of pivotal flashbacks in the film that took place at MI5’s Christmas party. Yes, I know! Hardly the first image of the secret service, is it? It’s where it all happened too, including who snogged who. And the irony that they’re all getting sloshed on Smirnoff vodka whilst fighting the Russians is repeated frequently throughout too. Good performances from Benedict Cumberbatch, Tom Hardy and Philip Martin Brown.
Oldman for best actor? I reckon he’ll get nominated. We’ll know January 24th 2012.

[rating=4]

Posted in 2011, BAFTA's 2012, Oscar's 2012 | Leave a comment

Final Destination 5

Since cinemas earliest day, the world of movie franchise has been responsible for classics from James Bond to Carry On, Star Wars to Jurassic Park, Pirates to Shrek, Potter to Rings. Thanks to my FilmFridays co-founder, I have dabbled in the slightly more commerical franchises including all 7 Saw films (in the space of a fortnight) and the Final Destination series. In what looks like the final destination of the Final Destination films, number 5 has hit the cinema screens this summer. The premise (as with all the films) is that some teenagers,  thanks to a completely unexplained premonition, manage to cheat death escaping an horrific accident that fate had determined would kill them. Eventually the escapees meet with horrible accidents until those remaining realise they too are destined to die. Yes fate is a fickle mistress and given the right opportunity she’ll kill you too. It’s a tried and tested formula, as is the way with franchise movies. So it should work again, right?

Not really. The film starts promisingly with a great scene involving a collapsing suspension bridge (this isn’t a spoiler, it’s splattered all over the trailer, if you’ll pardon the expression) The scene in the gymnasium is also brilliantly paced and full of suspense. But then something happens. Maybe the budget had been blown by this point. The film suddenly becomes very ordinary and unoriginal. Film is receiving greater competition than ever before from TV. To survive it cannot rely purely on Digital 8000 or 3d.(In fact we opted to see the film in 2d anyhow having failed to be seduced by that medium) To remain with the upperhand movies must be raising the stakes in all apsects of production rather than just the gimmicky ones. Originality should start at the movies. This film failed to do that.

It also failed to be better or even as good as it’s predecessors which is unforgivable for a movie franchise. Indeed, bad pre/sequels can ruin peoples opinions of the originals, even with the most succesful of franchises. This week saw the release of Star Wars on Blu-Ray, with a few Lucas touch-ups, including a now infamous scream from Darth Vader of “Noooooo”! as her saves his son from the Emperor in Episode 6. The alterations brought a similar reaction from outraged fans. Even the Twittersphere noted a disturbance in the Force “as if millions of
voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced!” The prequels were practically disowned by die hard fans of the originals. However, too much meddling may damage even their loyalty to those.

Mass production and indeed movie franchise maybe all very well and good for producers and their revenue forecasts, but blinkered number crunching and statistics can also cost you your relationship with the audience. And producers beware, the cinema goer is a fickle mistress.

[rating=1]

Posted in 2011, Halloween | Leave a comment

Barry Lyndon

Based on the 1844 novel by William Makepeace Thackeray, the story chronicles the rise and fall of Irishman Redmond Barry (Ryan O’Neal). His ascent in society through a mixture of luck and deviousness finds him rubbing shoulders with the aristocracy. He eventually finds himself husband to a wealthy and beautiful widow, father to newborn son and enemy to an estranged step-son. Oh and a new title granted to him by the king of the name “Barry Lyndon”. Cue his descent; a demise, our narrator informs us, which leaves him poor, lonely and childless. Lo and behold, that’s what happens. The End.
The highlight of this film, like most of Kubrick’s work, is the splendid cinematography owed to it by cinematographer and regular collaborator John Alcott. The film was shot using superfast 50mm lenses (developed originally for NASA) The secret to these lenses was their huge aperture (f/0.7 – to date the lowest f/stop in film history) This meant that for the most part they could abandon artificial lighting and even shoot scenes in just candle-light. There is no denying either that the numerous vista shots in the film are crisper than most HD cameras could dream of.

It was originally met with mixed reviews and was not a commercial success. This does not surprise me. Few films that long (2hrs50m) rarely are. It appears to have enjoyed a fashionable reprise of late, but I shan’t be jumping on the bandwagon myself. The film plods rather like the coarse version of Handel’s “Sarabande” that features heavily like some Clockwork Orange signature tune. Having not read the original Thackeray novel, I cannot compare whether the story being told is well serving to it. Despite a narration of the story from Michael Horden (which sometimes made you feel like you were watching Paddington Bear), the film’s telling of it leaves one feeling a little detached from its characters. By the end I cared very little for any of them.
Well, perhaps there was one. A superb performance at the start of the film from Leonard Rossiter as the cowardly courtier Captain John Quin. And Kubrick regular Phillip Stone makes a brief appearance towards the end – Stone would later become instantly recognisable as Delbert Grady, the original caretaker in The Shining.
[rating=2]

Posted in DVD | Leave a comment